top of page

The King's Speech: 70 years, 3 themes, 20 Bills, 12 months to go.



With three themes, twenty bills, and a ticking clock towards the next election, this King's Speech - the first under the watchful eye of King Charles III, the first monarch to address the State Opening of Parliament in 73 years - failed desperately ro deliver on the notion that Rishi Sunak equals change.


Sunak, with the weight of unmet expectations from his autumn conference speech, still fresh in public memory, needed to deliver. The economic pledges he made in Manchester in October were overshadowed by his botched handling of the HS2 announcement.


This was a second chance, an opportunity to reset the narrative, to instill confidence in a government facing the relentless tide of public scrutiny and growing apathy.


Yet, as the speech unfolded, it became apparent that this was not to be the seismic shift many had hoped for. The address, while touching on priorities like economic growth, public health, national security, and slaw and order, felt like a continuation of the status quo rather than the dawn of a bold new era.


The undercurrent of integrity, professionalism, and accountability was palpable, but the lack of immediate, tangible solutions to pressing issues like the cost of living crisis, NHS strains, and housing market stagnation left a void where reassurance should have been.


The Prime Minister spoke afterwards of achievements—reducing inflation, drawing foreign investments, nurturing a tech ecosystem brimming with potential. Yet, these successes, while commendable, seemed distant from the day-to-day challenges faced by the average person.


On public safety, the government's stance was clear: law and order would be the centrepiece of their agenda. An attempt to paint the opposition as weak, with a keen eye on Keir Starmer's record as Director of Public Prosecutions. However, the reality of police cuts and rising crime rates cast a shadow of doubt over this strategy. Moreover, the Bill's provision to avoid incarceration for offences warranting less than 12 months' sentence seemed counterintuitive, potentially allowing stalkers and domestic abusers to evade imprisonment.


It was not just what was said, but what remained unsaid that spoke volumes. The absence of immediate economic relief, healthcare reforms, or infrastructure echoed louder than the words spoken. Sunak's focus on crime and immigration felt like a distant drumbeat, out of sync with the rhythm of a nation grappling with mortgage hikes, soaring rental prices, and a living cost crisis spiraling out of control.



Labour's Keir Starmer, with his remarks on Westminster's high walls, seemed to capture the essence of the disconnect. His rebuttal painted a picture of a government out of touch, locked within an ivory tower while working people below weathered the storm of uncertainty. Starmer's vision for a 'Labour renewal' stood in stark contrast to what he termed 'Tory decline,' a rallying cry for those seeking more than just political rhetoric.


At a time when Britain needed a clarion call for action, a blueprint for growth and prosperity, it was met with a narrative that seemed to gloss over the immediate hardships. The speech, failed to address the urgent needs of a nation seeking not just long-term strategies but also short-term lifelines.


As the dust settles on the day's proceedings, one thing is abundantly clear—the speech was unlikely to alter the course of public opinion or shift the electoral dial.

Sunak's words, meant to inspire and unite, may well have fallen short of bridging the gap between government promises and public expectations.


For the people of Britain, the search for leadership that not only understands their plight but is also willing to take bold, decisive action, continues. As we inch closer to the polls, the nation watches, waits, and wonders if the change it so desperately seeks is on the horizon or if it remains a distant dream, obscured by the high walls of Westminster.

3 views0 comments

Comments


bottom of page